#Forsee in mac task manager how to
#Forsee in mac task manager mac os x
#Forsee in mac task manager password
#Forsee in mac task manager windows

#Forsee in mac task manager windows

> implementing this would impair use of Firefox on other platforms (pleaseД¬urrently, users can move Firefox profiles from Mac to Windows without losing their passwords. (And that's ignoring the fact that on the occasions when Keychain does show a warning dialog, such as application update, the dialog doesn't give you enough information to decide if it's a legitimate update.) I haven't tried to put together a complete exploit it just seems obvious to me that an operating system that doesn't carefully protect applications from each other can't have secure per-application storage. I'm just guessing based on seeing that gdb can attach to processes, vim can edit files in my Firefox profile, etc. > Unless you have found a security exploit that is unpublished, Keychain is as > fiddle with each others' address spaces, config/profile files, and executables. > I'm not convinced that Keychain provides any real security, given that apps can > trying to use Firefox on multiple OSes or switch between OSes.

> would cause a dialog to appear on every app update, and it would hurt users

#Forsee in mac task manager password

> I don't think Firefox's password stuff should be switched to Keychain. Part of the benefit of using Keychain is that the browser should access existing Keychain User ID/password information, as a number of other browsers presently do. There are also any number of web sites that, for one reason or another, do not show up in Firefox with their password. Keychain also has the ability to manually add a web site which Firefox does not yet. I can not imagine how you think that implementing this would impair use of Firefox on other platforms (please explain if you wish). Unless you have found a security exploit that is unpublished, Keychain is as secure as the password you use. Users browsing keychains directly will use Keychain Access, which has great and fast search functionality that makes it trivial to find the desired keychain item(s). browsers), in which case size is irrelevant because the app automatically handles lookup. ) Keychains are either used as a database by apps that interface to them (e.g. In a way that just storing the master password cannot.ДЄlso, the idea of a 'very full' keychain isn't really relevant.

#Forsee in mac task manager mac os x

With the Mac OS X platform and other keychain aware applications and tools * Using keychains at a fine-grained level enables overall better integration * Keychain Access is a much better UI for browsing stored account info than * Users can more easily take advantage of tools such as the Password AssistantДЇor generating unique and strong passwords. This allows some passwords to be secured at a * It's possible to store some items in non-login keychains that have their Benefits to proper keychain integration on Mac OS X include: A fully-integrated solution akin to Camino's would be preferable to most Mac users. Storing the FF master password in a keychain is not an appealing solution. > is solid, then just having the master password in the keychain is sufficient. > them) i think that as long as the encryption used by FF in its password file

#Forsee in mac task manager how to

(and the other apps need to know how to read > this allows other apps to acces & use them (with the users approval) but does

> 3) in Camino, all passwords are stored as individual entries in the keychain. > menus, UI consistancy) at a much higher priority.

> other MacOS/Mozilla integration problems (Internet Config, Page Setup, Java > (share certs and web passwords between web browsers). > I'm honestly not sure it's worth the effort to get that other 5% of functionality > Mozilla's storage for personal information around an OS-specific service. > keychain (OS-wide single-sign-on) without the pain of trying to re-architect > be stored/fetched from the MacOS keychain. > password Mozilla uses to encrypt personal information (passwords, certs, etc) to > I suggest the first step of MacOS keychain integration is to allow the (optional) When resetting Camino, the passwords are still there.ДЄlso, it is silly to make up data like '95% percent of the benefit'. Whenever I need to reset Mozilla or Firefox, all the passwords are Same stored passwords between different internet applications, with the user's That is useful, but the major benefit for me is using the Keychain allows groups of or all passwords to be locked or unlocked I strongly disagree that 95% of the benefit of keychain is what you'veДescribed.